<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Power Generation &#187; Environmental</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powergen.wordpress.com/category/environmental/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='powergen.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>Fish-friendly hydro turbines move center stage</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/fish-friendly-hydro-turbines-move-center-stage-2/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/fish-friendly-hydro-turbines-move-center-stage-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/fish-friendly-hydro-turbines-move-center-stage-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Hundreds of U.S. hydro plants come due for license renewal over the next decade, giving river and wildlife advocates an ideal time to push for fish-friendly turbine retrofits. With these new, e-&#8221;fish&#8221;-ent turbines, early retrofit projects have targeted up to 98% fish-passage efficiency and up to 15% more power output.

The 91,000 MW of hydropower capacity [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=96&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-top:7px;padding-left:7px;padding-right:7px;">
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Hundreds of U.S. hydro plants come due for license renewal over the next decade, giving river and wildlife advocates an ideal time to push for fish-friendly turbine retrofits. With these new, e-&#8221;fish&#8221;-ent turbines, early retrofit projects have targeted up to 98% fish-passage efficiency and up to 15% more power output.<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The 91,000 MW of hydropower capacity in the U.S. comes from about 180 federal projects and more than 2,000 non-federal projects regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Although the country has substantial undeveloped hydropower resources, little new construction is expected, and hydropower&#8217;s share of the nation&#8217;s generation is predicted to decline through 2020, due to a combination of environmental issues, regulatory pressures, and changes in energy economics.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">FERC is the lead permitting agency for private hydroelectric plants. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the eastern part of the country, and the National Marine Fishery Service for the western part, are other agencies that make recommendations on fish mortality goals. In response to the 1986 Electric Consumers Protection Act, these agencies have set their target as &#8220;no fish production loss&#8221; for all new hydro projects as well as for any projects for which the hydraulic lease is expiring. That last phrase is key, because there are hundreds of plants in the U.S. that must pass through the relicensing minefield over the next decade. About 80% of California&#8217;s hydropower is subject to a FERC license, and about half of those facilities—approximately 4,000 MW at 150 projects—are due for license renewal in the next 15 years.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-96"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Save the fish<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbines installed decades ago were designed with one thing in mind: maximizing power output. Although fish ladders were typically built for migratory fish, little thought was given to the side effects of fish injury and mortality caused by passage through the turbines or lower levels of dissolved oxygen in downstream water. Fish mortality rates currently range from 5% for the least-harmful existing turbines to more than 30% for more-damaging turbines.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Fortunately, special fish-friendly designs developed over the past decade have come into operation at several hydro power stations, significantly improving fish-passage efficiency while increasing power output. In fact, the repowering of projects built 50 years ago could eventually improve plant output by as much as 15%, thereby making a fish-friendly retrofit project economically feasible. The fish win, and so do plant owners and electric consumers.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbine-passage survival is a complicated function of gap sizes, runner blade angles, wicket gate openings and overhang, and water passageway flow patterns (see box). The consequence to fish populations of unaccommodating turbines is especially serious among migratory species—such as salmon, steelhead, and American shad—and eels that must pass downstream all the way to the sea, perhaps through multiple turbines, to complete their life cycle. That&#8217;s why increasing the passage efficiency of juvenile salmonids at Pacific Northwest hydro plants is one of the major challenges facing the industry. According to the Bonneville Power Authority (BPA), juvenile salmonids outmigrating to the Pacific Ocean through the Columbia River Basin during high spring flows experience a 5% to 25% mortality rate at each hydroelectric project they encounter. During this time, BPA—already teetering on the verge of bankruptcy and rising electricity costs—must reduce its power generation potential by $160 million per year through increased spills and other operations designed to increase fish-passage efficiency.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operates eight multipurpose dams on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers as part of the Federal Columbia River Power System. The Corps&#8217; Columbia River Fish Mitigation program focuses on improving the passage of adult and juvenile salmon either around these dams with fish screens or through them with expensive fish-bypass structures. The Corps estimates that it will spend $1.4 billion implementing its fish-mitigation program, according to a 1998 report. About $908 million of this total will be spent on the construction of fish-passage projects and related studies from fiscal year 1999 through the scheduled completion of the program in fiscal year 2007, although currently shrinking budgets may place this goal in jeopardy.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>New turbine designs arrive<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The goal of the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s (DOE&#8217;s) Advanced Hydropower Turbine System (AHTS) program is to develop technology that will maximize the country&#8217;s hydropower resources while minimizing adverse environmental effects. The AHTS program is closely coordinated with industry and other stakeholders—such as Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County (Washington), the Electric Power Research Institute, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, BPA, and National Marine Fishery Service—which all have a part to play in implementing advanced turbine designs.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The survival of turbine-passed fish depends greatly on characteristics of both the hydropower plant—the type and size of the turbine, environmental setting, and mode of operation—and the entrained fish—species, size, and physiological condition. Some small, Pelton-type turbines designed for high-head installations most likely cause complete mortality due to their basic design (Figure 2). On the other hand, the survival of small fish encountering turbine types with larger water passages—such as Kaplan, Francis, and bulb turbines—is commonly 70% or greater for current plants (Figure 3). Among the most fish-friendly conventional turbines, large Kaplan turbines used at the mainstem Columbia and Snake River dams have shown average fish survival (including both direct and indirect effects) of about 88% (Figure 4).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>2. Pelton turbine: nearly 100% mortality<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In a Pelton or impulse turbine, the water is directed onto clamshell buckets attached to the periphery of the impeller wheel to impart a torque on the turbine impeller. High rotating speeds and tight clearances mean almost 100% fish mortality.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: VA Tech Hydro</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>3. Kaplan turbine<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">This cross section of a fish-friendly Kaplan turbine shows the details of the stay vanes, wicket gates, and runner with hub and water passages. Water enters through the semi-spiral case, passes through the stay vanes and wicket gates, then through the runner, and finally into the draft tube, exiting to the tail waters.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Voith Siemens Hydro</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>4. Francis turbine<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Francis turbines for power generation typically are used where high flow rates are available at medium hydraulic head—such as the world-famous Niagara Falls. Water enters the turbine through a volute casing and is directed onto the blades by wicket gates. The low-momentum water then exits the turbine through a draft tube.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: VA Tech Hydro</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">That&#8217;s why new fish-friendly turbine designs are a vital part of hydro&#8217;s future. The U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s Advanced Hydropower Turbine System program has identified specific injury mechanisms, which include:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbulent flows or cavitation in turbine water passages resulting from low-efficiency designs or plant operating strategies where extremely low water pressures cause the formation of vapor bubbles, which subsequently collapse violently.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbulent flows and the trapping and cutting of fish in the zone of flow passing near the turbine hub when large gaps between blade and hub exist (characterizing the lower-output operation of Kaplan turbines).<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Strike of fish by turbine blades or impact of fish on structures including runner blades, stay vanes, wicket gates, and draft tube piers.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Shear stress when two bodies of water of different velocities collide across a fish&#8217;s body. The highest values of shear stress are found close to the interface between the flow and solid objects it speeds by, such as the blade leading edges, vanes, and gates.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Rapid and extreme pressure changes (water pressures within the turbine may increase to several times atmospheric pressure, then drop to sub-atmospheric pressure, all in a matter of seconds).<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Abrasion and grinding: Abrasion occurs with the rubbing action of a fish against rough turbine surfaces by flow turbulence and is dependent on flow discharge and velocity, number and spacing of turbine blades, and the geometry of flow passages. Grinding injury can occur when a fish is drawn into small clearances (gaps of sizes close to that of the fish) within the turbine system.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Testing of new designs with fish-friendly features has demonstrated even higher survival rates. The mission of the AHTS program has been to develop turbines that achieve 98% survival of turbine-passed fish.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Corkscrew turbine uncorked<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The original AHTS design teams selected by the DOE in 1995 are still involved in bringing the fish-friendly designs to market. They are:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Alden Research Laboratory (ARL, Holden, Mass.);<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Concepts NREC (White River Junction, Vt.), which was formed by the merger of Concepts ETI with Northern Research and Engineering Corp; and<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Voith Siemens Hydro Power Generation Inc (Heidenheim, Germany; U.S. office: York, Pa.) with team members Georgia Tech, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), MWH Consultants, and Normandeau Associates.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The latest ARL-designed runner (the &#8220;runner&#8221; in a hydro turbine is analogous to an impeller in a pump) uses only three long blades, which are wrapped around the central hub in a corkscrew shape to gradually reduce pressure and minimize blade-induced injuries. This is much different than the 6 to 10 blades found on most traditional hydro turbines. The new runner minimizes the number of blade leading edges, reduces the pressure-versus-time and the velocity- versus-distance gradients within the runner, minimizes clearance between the runner and runner housing, and maximizes the size of flow passages.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">End result: Fish get more room in the water to swim through the turbine on their way to upstream spawning grounds or downstream to the ocean (Figure 5).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>5. New runner: nearly 100% survival<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl4.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Alden Research Lab designed a fish-friendly runner that minimizes internal clearances and maximizes flow passages with a minimal impact on turbine efficiency. Tests have demonstrated fish survival rates approaching 99%.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: U.S. Department of Energy</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Despite its dramatically different geometry, the new turbine has a predicted efficiency of only a few percentage points lower than a conventional turbine, although the power density is reduced. This means that, for modernizing a plant, the volume of the power house must increase to produce the same power output. For this reason the ARL design will focus on new installations. &#8220;The new fish-friendly turbine is expected to be used for new generation capacity, as replacements for existing turbines, and in fish-diversion systems installed near the main turbines,&#8221; says Thomas Cook, project manager for ARL. &#8220;We expect the cost of the new fish-friendly turbine to be comparable to existing hydraulic turbines.&#8221; Testing of a 2,000-hp full-scale model demonstrated control fish survival up to 99%, depending on fish size and turbine head. ARL has obtained patents for the new designs.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>E-&#8221;fish&#8221;-ent turbines<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">For its contribution to the AHTS program, Voith Siemens Hydro (VSH) proposed building on the success of ongoing internal R&amp;D programs and investigating the impact of existing turbine designs in relation to fish passage efficiency and developing new turbine designs that improve efficiency and reduce environmental effects for rehab projects. The results include design concepts for improved fish- passage survival in Kaplan and Francis turbines as well as designs for boosting dissolved oxygen levels in discharges from Francis turbines.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Elements of the advanced Kaplan designs were implemented in rehabilitated units recently installed at the Chelan County Public Utility District&#8217;s Rocky Reach powerplant, at the Corps of Engineers&#8217; Bonneville Dam, and at the Tennessee Valley Authority&#8217;s (TVA&#8217;s) Kentucky Dam. An even more advanced design has been developed and model-tested for the Grant County Public Utility District&#8217;s Wanapum Dam. These fish-friendly designs generally focused on modifications to a Kaplan turbine that eliminated runner gaps, improved blade shapes, and included an advanced control system to sense the presence of fish and adjust to fish-friendly operation (Figure 6). Other major VSH design features that came out of the AHTS program include:<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>6. Advanced Kaplan design<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl5.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Voith Siemens Hydro supplied the first 2 of 10 units being replaced at the Corps of Engineers Bonneville Powerhouse 1. The remaining eight units will be rehabilitated at the rate of one per year through 2008. Test on the first unit showed a fish survival rate of 93.8% to 97.5% for the MGR design.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Voith Siemens Hydro</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">High efficiency over a wide operating range with reduced cavitation potential.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A minimum gap runner (MGR) design, characterized as a design with a fully spherical discharge ring, no gap near the hub, and runner blades that tend to be thicker near the leading edge.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A non-overhanging design for wicket gates.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Environmentally compatible hydraulic fluid and lubricants, and greaseless wicket gate bushing.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Smooth surface finishes in conjunction with upgrades for stay vanes, wicket gates, and draft tube cone.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">VSH and the Georgia Institute of Technology are employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of turbulent jets to better understand the fluid stresses that fish experience as they pass through hydroelectric turbines. VSH is using the same CFD model to relate measured velocity fields in an experimental flume used to expose fish to shear and turbulence to predicted velocity fields in a turbine at the Wanapum Dam on the Columbia River. Additional software (VSH&#8217;s &#8220;Virtual Fish&#8221; model) is being used to estimate flow-induced loads on both flume-passed and turbine-passed fish.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">VSH has also developed several advanced computational tools for estimating trajectories of fish-like bodies passing through hydro turbines. The motion of the &#8220;virtual fish&#8221; is governed by a set of differential equations that account for the fish mass and various flow-induced forces. This model can be used not only to estimate the trajectory of a virtual fish from the forebay to the tailrace, but it also can provide specific information about a variety of flow-induced loads on fish passing through various zones of turbine flow.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Controls too<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The fish stand to benefit both from new turbine designs and from new control systems for those turbines. For example, VSH and TVA jointly developed new controls to operate their fish-friendly hydro turbines. And Hydro Resource Solutions (Norris, Tenn.) markets &#8220;WaterView,&#8221; the state of the art in real-time hydro plant performance optimization when constrained by factors such as fish-passage criteria, civitation limits, avoidance zones, and ramp rates. For example, WaterView can:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Limit turbine operation to fish-friendly modes when sensors indicate that fish are present and optimize plant performance whether fish are present or not.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Streamline the periodic updates of Kaplan turbine &#8220;digital cam surfaces&#8221; to most efficient operation at each head and flow, minimizing fish-injuring flow turbulence.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Sense active cavitation and limit turbine operation to noncavitating conditions.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Optimize plant output when fish are present to achieve targeted fish-passage survival based on fish presence, location, turbine-passage mortality, spillway fish mortality, fish bypass characteristics, and total dissolved gas generated during spilling.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Bonneville Dam<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The Corps of Engineers plans to install MGR on all 10 units at the Bonneville Powerhouse 1. The first units to be replaced were Unit 6—put into commercial operation on July 27, 1999—and Unit 4, which returned to service in September 1999. The remaining eight units will be rehabilitated at the rate of one per year through 2008.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The Corps conducted biological tests on Unit 6 after its retrofit to determine the unit&#8217;s ability to pass juvenile salmon safely. The survival of turbine-passed fish through Unit 6 was compared with the survival of fish passed through Unit 5, an adjacent, conventional Kaplan turbine. The goal of the biological testing was to determine if the MGR is at least equivalent to the existing machine in terms of fish-passage mortality. The biological tests, co-funded by the Corps, Grant County Public Utility District No. 2, DOE, and BPA, were conducted between November 1999 and January 2000 with a release of 7,200 balloon-tagged fish.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Overall injury rates among turbine-passed fish were impressively low for both units: 1.5% and 2.5% for the MGR and Kaplan unit, respectively. Survival rates of fish passing near the hub also were high (97% or greater) for both units, while survival rates for fish passing through the mid-blade region ranged from 95% to 97% and did not differ between units.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">At all four power levels tested, the MGR showed better survival rates than the conventional Kaplan for fish that passed near the blade tip. Survival for blade tip–released fish ranged from 90.8% to 95.6% for the conventional Kaplan and from 93.8% to 97.5% for the MGR.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Chelan County is first<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County in Washington State owns and operates the second-largest non-federal hydroelectric generating system in the U.S. The District&#8217;s three hydroelectric projects—Rocky Reach, Rock Island, and Lake Chelan—have a combined generating capacity of over 2,000 MW (Figure 7).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>7. Rocky Reach plant<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl6.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The Chelan County Public Utilities District is nearing completion of a major upgrade of all 11 units at its Rocky Reach plant.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: Chelan County Public Utility District</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Rocky Reach Units 1 to 7, six-bladed vertical Kaplan turbines rated 140,000 hp, were built in the early 1960s by Allis Chalmers (now VSH). Turbines for the remaining Units 8 to 11, originally vertical propeller turbines rated 177,000 hp, were built in the early 1970s.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the early 1990s, Units 1 to 7 began experiencing severe runner blade cracking, starting at the interface between the blades and the trunnions and progressing diagonally into the blade leaves. In June 1994, after completing a round of competitive model testing, the District awarded a contract for the rehabilitation of Units 1 through 7 to Voith Riva Hydro (now VSH).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">While rehabilitation of Units 1 through 7 was moving forward, the rehabilitation of Units 8 to 11 became more pressing due to increased restrictions on unit operation to aid downstream fish passage. The VSH contract was amended to add turbine rehabilitation for Units 8 to 11.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">During the model development phase, new ideas related to the safe passage of juvenile fish through the turbines were identified, building on the Bonneville Powerhouse 1 designs. VSH completed additional testing and model development based on the elimination of wedge-shaped gaps between runner blades and adjacent components and minimizing the runner hub-blade gaps upstream and downstream of the blade trunnion.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Also, a fully spherical discharge ring was developed for Units 8 through 11, closing the gap between the runner blade periphery and the discharge ring along the entire length of the blade. This elimination of the upstream blade-hub gap was later applied to all 11 Rocky Reach turbines, as well as other hydroelectric projects along the Columbia River, such as the Wanapum and Bonneville.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Rehabilitation of all 11 Rocky Reach units is scheduled for completion this spring.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Grant County advances<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Last August, the DOE chose Washington State&#8217;s Grant County Public Utility District (PUD) to test a single fish-friendly turbine at its 1,038-MW Wanapum Dam on the Columbia River. &#8220;The new turbine is designed to allow salmon smolts to pass through the dam without injury,&#8221; says Stephen Brown, the PUD&#8217;s hydro engineering supervisor. But there&#8217;s also a nice side benefit: The proposed fish-friendly turbines are much more efficient than the existing turbines. The eventual uprating of all 10 Wanapum Dam units would provide an additional 300 MW of power to meet peak loads.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">New advances in understanding the correlation between the turbine operation point and fish survivability can also contribute to improved operating efficiencies on the mainstem dams. Tests of the existing turbines at Wanapum Dam used balloon-tagged fish to verify many of the fish mortality mechanisms. These tests clearly demonstrated increased fish survival rates at increased flow rates (beyond the turbines&#8217; &#8220;best-efficiency&#8221; points). The result: increased power generation and improved fish-passage survival.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">These results counter the conventional hydro plant wisdom that says fish survival is reduced under conditions of very low operating efficiency. Fish-passage studies of Kaplan turbines at Lower Granite, Rocky Reach, and Wanapum Dams have all failed to detect a direct relationship between the &#8220;1% of peak turbine efficiency&#8221; target that is employed in the Columbia River basin and probability of highest survival.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">&#8220;Our goal is to lessen injury on fish,&#8221; according to Brown. &#8220;We are looking for a 98% survival rate.&#8221; Brown said the federal government is picking up half of the $2.5-million engineering and biological testing cost. Grant PUD will cover the other $2.5 million, plus the cost of the turbine and installation, for a total of $14.5 million. The new turbine is scheduled for installation in late 2004, with testing set for spring 2005.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>McNary Dam rehab<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">McNary Dam, at 7,265 ft long and 183 ft high—one of the largest hydroelectric power facilities in the U.S.—is among a succession of dams on the Columbia River between Oregon and Washington that must be navigated by salmon during their annual downstream migration to the ocean. After nearly 50 years of constant use, the turbines at McNary Dam are being studied by the BPA and the Corps of Engineers for total replacement during a 13-year powerhouse overhaul. In June 2002, four contracts were awarded to firms specializing in manufacturing large hydroelectric turbines:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">VSH;<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Alstom Power (Littleton, Colo.);<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">G.E. Hydro Power (Pleasanton, Calif.); and<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">VA Tech Voest MCE (Charlotte, N.C.).<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Each of these firms will design, build, and test scale models of a new turbine they would propose to install at McNary. The full-size turbine will be subjected to in-stream biological testing and evaluated for both fish survival and hydraulic performance. The test results will be incorporated as part of the National Environmental Policy Act analysis required for the rehab permit.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">&#8220;The outcome of the testing, analysis, and the public input process could lead to a federal decision to replace all 14 of the existing 80-MW Kaplan turbines,&#8221; said Kevin Crum, project manager for the Corps of Engineers.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Fish gotta breathe too<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Mechanical injury is not the only fish- damaging aspect of hydro turbines. Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels downstream of a powerhouse tend to drop during warm months, effectively suffocating fish that had successfully passed through the turbines. This is a particular problem in the U.S. Southeast.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the 1980s, VSH and TVA invested in a joint research partnership to enhance DO concentrations in releases from Francis-type turbines. &#8220;Auto-venting&#8221; (AVT), or &#8220;self-aerating&#8221; turbines, which use the low pressures created by flows entering the turbine to induce additional airflows, typically are the most cost-effective technologies for Francis turbines (Figure 8).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>8. Adding air to water<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl7.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Voith Siemens Hydro has revolutionized the design of auto-venting turbines by the use of hollow blades and aerating holes that increase the amount of dissolved oxygen added to the water passing through the turbine.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Voith Siemens Hydro</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the last 10 years, significant progress has been made. TVA has developed reliable line diffuser technologies and surface-water pumps for low-cost aeration of reservoirs upstream of hydro plants and effective labyrinth weirs and infuser weirs for aerating downstream flows.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">TVA&#8217;s Norris Dam was selected as the first site to demonstrate the AVT technologies. The two Norris AVTs have specially shaped turbine component geometries developed to enhance low pressures at locations for aeration outlets in the turbine water passage, to draw air into an efficiently absorbed bubble cloud, and to minimize aeration auxiliary power. Results show that up to 5.5 mg/l of additional DO uptake can be obtained for single-unit operation with all aeration options operating. In this case, the amount of air aspirated by the turbine is more than twice that obtained in the original turbines with hub baffles. Compared to the original turbines at the plant, these specially designed replacement units increased overall efficiency 3.5% and increased capacity by 10%. The new runners also have shown significant reductions in both cavitation and vibration.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first uprated and rehabilitated AVT was recently returned to service at the Corps of Engineers&#8217; J. Strom Thurmond plant in Clarks Hill, South Carolina. The 48-yr-old plant—yes, it was named for the ageless senator that long ago—is being upgraded with Francis runners designed to increase the levels of DO in rivers with depleted or diminished gas content. Seasonal stratifications result in the discharge of water with less than 1 mg/l DO during the summer months as far as 16 miles downstream from the dam. Georgia and South Carolina have a standard of 5 mg/l for that portion of the Savannah River.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The modified Francis turbine design includes fewer blades, improved blade shapes, and larger spaces between blades that improve fish-passage survival as well. Initial tests last September of the first installed unit showed DO improvement of slightly more than 4.0 mg/l with minimal impact on turbine efficiency.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first of seven new aerating turbines arrived at J. Strom Thurmond in March 2002. The second turbine is due to arrive March 2003, and by 2006 all seven should be installed and operating.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By Dr. Robert Peltier, PE, Sr. Editor</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/96/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/96/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/96/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/96/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/96/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/96/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=96&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/fish-friendly-hydro-turbines-move-center-stage-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl1.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl2.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl3.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl4.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl5.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl6.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0716-fishfriendl7.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How fish-friendly turbines work</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/how-fish-friendly-turbines-work/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/how-fish-friendly-turbines-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/how-fish-friendly-turbines-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantifying the fish injuries caused by a hydroelectric turbine often has been based more on model predictions than actual measurements. Survival rates measured for fish passing directly through a modern large turbine range from 88% to 94%. By comparison, fish bypass system survival rates typically range from 95% to 98% percent and from 95% to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=88&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Quantifying the fish injuries caused by a hydroelectric turbine often has been based more on model predictions than actual measurements. Survival rates measured for fish passing directly through a modern large turbine range from 88% to 94%. By comparison, fish bypass system survival rates typically range from 95% to 98% percent and from 95% to 99% percent for a spillway system.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-88"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">It&#8217;s important to realize, however, that the net survival rates are substantially lower, because each fish has to pass through several turbines during its long journey to the sea (Figure 1).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">1. Hydro turbine system: Fish-passage issues<br />
</span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0715-howfishfrie1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbine-passage survival is a complicated function of gap sizes, runner blade angles, wicket gate openings and overhang, and water passageway flow patterns.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: U.S. Department of Energy</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">That&#8217;s why new fish-friendly turbine designs are a vital part of hydro&#8217;s future. The U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s Advanced Hydropower Turbine System program has identified specific injury mechanisms, which include:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbulent flows or cavitation in turbine water passages resulting from low-efficiency designs or plant operating strategies where extremely low water pressures cause the formation of vapor bubbles, which subsequently collapse violently.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Turbulent flows and the trapping and cutting of fish in the zone of flow passing near the turbine hub when large gaps between blade and hub exist (characterizing the lower-output operation of Kaplan turbines).<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Strike of fish by turbine blades or impact of fish on structures including runner blades, stay vanes, wicket gates, and draft tube piers.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Shear stress when two bodies of water of different velocities collide across a fish&#8217;s body. The highest values of shear stress are found close to the interface between the flow and solid objects it speeds by, such as the blade leading edges, vanes, and gates.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Rapid and extreme pressure changes (water pressures within the turbine may increase to several times atmospheric pressure, then drop to sub-atmospheric pressure, all in a matter of seconds).<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Abrasion and grinding: Abrasion occurs with the rubbing action of a fish against rough turbine surfaces by flow turbulence and is dependent on flow discharge and velocity, number and spacing of turbine blades, and the geometry of flow passages. Grinding injury can occur when a fish is drawn into small clearances (gaps of sizes close to that of the fish) within the turbine system.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/88/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/88/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/88/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/88/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/88/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/88/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=88&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/how-fish-friendly-turbines-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0715-howfishfrie1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas turbine combustors drive emissions toward nil</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[




Best available control technology continues to be ratcheted down to achieve ever-lower NOx emissions. Some dry low-NOx combustors can achieve 9 ppm without post-combustion control, while newer catalytic combustors are operating below 5 ppm NOx.

In the late 1980s, gas turbine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to integrate dry low-NOx (DLN)—also referred to as dry low-emission [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=80&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-top:7px;padding-left:7px;padding-right:7px;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Best available control technology continues to be ratcheted down to achieve ever-lower NOx emissions. Some dry low-NOx combustors can achieve 9 ppm without post-combustion control, while newer catalytic combustors are operating below 5 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the late 1980s, gas turbine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to integrate dry low-NOx (DLN)—also referred to as dry low-emission (DLE)—combustion technology into their product lines to eliminate the need for steam or water injection, which had been the traditional method of NOx control. Many DLN technologies were evaluated, and lean premixed combustion emerged as the most promising approach for near-term application.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-80"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Throughout the next decade, lean premixed combustors installed in new models and retrofits to existing units dramatically slashed NOx emissions compared with conventional diffusion flame technology (Figure 1). But, like so many things in nature, the benefits of NOx reduction came at a price. Because the optimum flame temperature of a lean premixed combustor is close to the lean flammability limit, combustor performance is characterized by a CO/NOx tradeoff. At the combustor design point, both CO and NOx are below target levels; however, deviations from the design flame temperature cause emissions to increase. This tradeoff becomes particularly important during part-load turbine operation, when the combustor is required to run even leaner (Figure 2, p. 24).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>1. NOx limits<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec1.png?w=32&#038;h=50" alt="" width="32" height="50" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Best available control technology (BACT) NOx limits have plummeted in the past 20 years. Will 5 ppm NOx soon become the national standard?<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: U.S. Department of Energy</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The power output of a gas turbine is directly related to the firing temperature, which is directly related to flame temperature and the rate of thermal NOx formation. The formation of NOx increases dramatically when the temperature exceeds 2,900F on natural gas. Because traditional diffusion flame combustor temperatures can exceed 4,000F for brief periods, it is virtually impossible to achieve ultra-low NOx levels when a turbine is fired with a diffusion flame combustor.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Key: Low flame temps<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Low emissions of NOx, as well as CO, can be achieved with thorough fuel-air mixing and control of the adiabatic flame temperature below about 3,000F. If, on the other hand, the peak combustion temperature can be limited to about 2,800F, NOx levels can be less than a few parts per million (ppm). Unfortunately, at fuel-air ratios low enough to achieve such low NOx concentrations, flames are highly unstable and are susceptible to flame-out or fluctuations, which can cause severe combustor vibrations and fatigue failure of combustion components.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In contrast to lean premixed combustion, an alternative technology known as &#8220;catalytic combustion&#8221; does not involve issues of flame stability. The fuel-air ratio entering the catalyst simply needs to be high enough to generate the desired turbine-inlet temperature at full conversion of the fuel.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">One of the great difficulties with lean premixed systems is maintaining flame stability in the narrow flame temperature range between high NOx production and lean flame extinction. Aerodynamically stabilized injectors have very narrow ranges of operation, necessitating multiple burner staging (up to four stages in some systems) or piloting. Many turbine manufacturers have refined their DLN systems to sub-25 ppm NOx levels, and some Frame units have achieved single-digit, or sub-10 ppm, NOx levels.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Whereas the U.S. spends millions for increased capital and maintenance costs for the latest DLN technology and postcombustion cleanup equipment to reach ever-lower NOx limits at virtually all powerplants, the European Union has taken a different approach: The EU sets NOx limits based on plant efficiency. For example, the NOx requirement for simple-cycle units with an efficiency greater than 35% is approximately 24 ppm on natural gas and 58 ppm on liquid fuels. Gaseous fuels other than natural gas have a limit of 58 ppm.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">NOx limits are less stringent for gas turbines used in combined heat and power systems demonstrating an overall efficiency greater than 75% and for combined-cycle plants demonstrating an annual average electrical efficiency greater than 55%.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Solar does DLE<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first two prototype production DLE systems manufactured by Solar Turbines Inc (San Diego, Calif.) were installed in 1992 for field evaluation. These were a Centaur 50S gas turbine, rated 4.1 MW, at El Paso Natural Gas Co&#8217;s Window Rock Station near Window Rock, Ariz., and a Mars 100S gas turbine, rated 10.5 MW, at the Pacific Gas Transmission station near Rosalia, Wash. Initially, high combustion pressure oscillations limited operation to 42 ppm NOx. The oscillations were controlled in the short term by raising pilot fuel flow, but this increased NOx and CO. The pilot fuel injector circuit is used mainly for light-off and low-load operation. During light-off and low-load operation, approximately 30% to 50% of the fuel passes through the pilot injector, providing a rich fuel-air mixture and improved combustion stability. Above 50% load, the pilot fuel is reduced to less than 5% of the total fuel flow to optimize emissions performance (Figure 3, p. 26).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>2. Emissions compromises<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec2.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Combustor design is a series of compromises between robust operation at all loads versus lower NOx and CO. Lean combustion also increases combustion noise–caused fatigue failure of combustion components in early DLN systems.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: Platts</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>3. Dry low-emission (DLE) fuel injectors<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec3.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">DLE fuel injectors are significantly larger than conventional ones due to the higher airflow through the injector air swirler and the required volume of the premixing chamber. The injector module includes a premixing main fuel injector and a pilot fuel injector.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Design of Solar&#8217;s fuel injector premixing section was optimized by the mid-1990s. This reduced combustor pressure oscillations and, when combined with injector design improvements, enabled emissions warranties of 25 ppm NOx on natural gas and 96 ppm NOx on liquid fuels. This guarantee was extended to all of Solar&#8217;s models.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In 2001, an augmented backside-cooled combustor liner was incorporated into the OEM&#8217;s Centaur 50S and Taurus 60S models, allowing a further emissions reduction to 15 ppm NOx and 25 ppm CO from 50 to 100% load, following more than 22,000 hrs of field testing.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The most significant difference in Solar Turbines&#8217; new lean premixed combustor liner is the increased combustor volume required for low CO and unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) emissions at the lower overall flame temperature. Because combustor length was constrained by field retrofit opportunities, the only option was to increase the diameter of the combustor liner. A second difference is the absence of large air injection ports in the combustor primary zone. All air used in the combustion process is introduced through the air swirler of the fuel injectors (Figure 4, p. 26).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>4. Larger-diameter combustor liners<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec4.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The increased volume of the DLE combustor required the diameter to increase while holding the length constant so existing engines could be retrofitted. High- time DLE combustor liners have more than 39,000 operating hours.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The new DLE combustor incorporates the capability to regulate the combustor airflow and pilot fuel flow over the entire engine-operating map. The requirement to control these two parameters has added a degree of complexity to the control system that is not required in a conventional gas turbine. During start-up and low-load operation, the pilot flow rate has been optimized to achieve maximum flame stability to handle load transients. Below 50% load the combustor airflow is managed in the same way as in a conventional engine. Above 50% rated load, Solar&#8217;s DLE engine enters the &#8220;low emissions mode,&#8221; modulating either the bleed valves or inlet guide vanes to keep the combustion primary zone temperature within a specified range. Solar&#8217;s DLE gas turbine controls use the power turbine inlet temperature as an indirect measurement of the primary zone temperature to control the bleed valve or inlet guide vane position as a function of turbine load (Figure 5).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>5. SoLoNOx system<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec5.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A Centaur 50 gas turbine with a dual-fuel SoLoNOx system supplies power and heat to a district energy system in Germany.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Local ambient conditions also affect emissions. NOx is observed to increase with increasing ambient temperature, decreasing relative humidity, and increasing barometric pressure, whereas CO emissions trend in the opposite way. However, field experience has shown that relative humidity and barometric pressure have only a small effect on the combustor primary zone temperature and, therefore, a small influence on emissions from DLE gas turbines. In practice, emissions from DLE packages vary less than 5 ppm from 0F to 120F. Many DLE packages are configured to increase pilot fuel flow at temperatures below 68F to augment flame stability. Below 0F, NOx and CO emissions increase.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Further reductions<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Future emissions reductions mean developing new technologies to take up where DLE leaves off. One area being explored by Solar Turbines is a surface-stabilized fuel injector for use with lean, premixed combustors. Developed by Alzeta Corp (Santa Clara, Calif.), surface-stabilized fuel injectors provide extended turndown and ultra-low NOx emission performance.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The new injectors form interacting radiant and blue-flame zones immediately above a selectively perforated porous metal surface. This allows stable operation at low reaction temperatures. A proof-of-concept injector in a full-pressure test rig at the U.S. DOE&#8217;s National Energy Technology Laboratory in Morgantown, W.Va., achieved sub-3 ppm NOx emissions with concurrent single-digit CO emissions. Operating conditions ranged between inlet pressures of 26.5 psia and 180 psia, inlet temperatures between 186F and 850F, and calculated adiabatic flame temperatures between 2,670F and 2,900F. Testing with prototype fuel injectors in test rigs at Solar Turbines yielded similar results. In May 2001, the OEM&#8217;s 1-MW Saturn gas turbine was operated to 95% load with a surface-stabilized injector. Currently, Alzeta and Solar Turbines are completing a multi-burner annular combustor test, which will then proceed to an engine test later this year. In addition, the companies have initiated a project to apply Alzeta&#8217;s nanoSTAR technology to the Titan 130 gas turbine.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Mitsubishi hits 15<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Mitsubishi Power Systems Inc&#8217;s (Lake Mary, Fla.) first DLN combustor was introduced in 1984 on a 50-Hz M701D gas turbine. By 1992, 25-ppm NOx levels were being commercially achieved in the OEM&#8217;s F-class turbine operating at full load, with a turbine inlet temperature of 2,460F.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Mitsubishi&#8217;s F-class fleet experience with DLN combustors now exceeds 1.5 million hours of meeting the 25 ppm NOx limit. The OEM reports that recent tests have achieved 15 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The pilot nozzle and air bypass valve in this combustor make it possible to sustain a stable flame and accurately control the fuel-air ratio. The main nozzles are composed of air swirlers together with a fuel nozzle. The swirlers introduce highly turbulent air, causing complete mixing of gas and air, while the pilot nozzle allows stable combustion of the premixed gas by diffusion firing. A cone attached at the tip makes flame holding stable by recirculating combustion gases. The air bypass valve, infusing air directly into the transition piece, is installed at the transition piece, enabling an almost constant fuel-air ratio at various operating conditions, such as ignition, acceleration, and partial-load operation (Figure 6).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>6. Contrasting cooling schemes<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec6.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The cooling scheme in Mitsubishi&#8217;s F-class turbine uses proprietary &#8220;Platfin&#8221; cooling of the combustor basket, and &#8220;Mtfin&#8221; is used at transition piece. Around 10% of available air is used for cooling, and the rest is used for combustion. The G-class combustor uses steam for cooling (bottom).<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Mitsubishi Power Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In 1996, a steam-cooled DLN combustor was developed for Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class gas turbines. The M501G and M701G models feature a turbine inlet temperature of 2,730F and are designed to achieve a combined-cycle plant efficiency of greater than 58%. Prototype testing has shown the G series to be capable of 25 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">To increase the turbine inlet temperature to 2,730F, almost all of the compressed air is needed for combustion, and steam is introduced to perform the cooling. (In conventional gas turbines, much of the compressed air is diverted to cool hot-gas-path components.) Overall, Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class combustor has nearly the same configuration as its F class, except at the combustor basket, where the transition piece integrates the basket part and the liner. The cooling steam, supplied from a required bottoming steam cycle, cools that structure over the entire surface area of the combustor.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The M701G1 combustion chamber and first- and second-stage blades and vanes are similar to those used in the prototype 501G design, but the size has been increased to give a higher output. The 701G1 is a single-shaft machine with the generator at the compressor end of the turbine to allow the turbine exhaust to be directed into the heat-recovery steam generator. The turbine combustion chamber uses steam cooling to maintain temperature in the range 2,730F to 2,910F to keep NOx emissions at 25 ppm or less. Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class fleet experience exceeds 75,000 hours on seven units.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Aero engines<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE Power Systems&#8217; (Atlanta, Ga.) DLE combustors have been developed for GE&#8217;s aeroderivative gas turbines—the gas-fueled 44-MW LM6000, the 23-MW LM2500, and the double annular 15-MW LM1600. Twenty-five ppm has been successfully demonstrated for the entire family of LM DLE products.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Factory testing of components and engine assembly on the first 41-MW DLE LM6000 gas turbine was completed in 1994 and demonstrated less than 15 ppm NOx, 10 ppm CO, and 2 ppm UHC at a firing temperature of 2,350F. In 1995, the 43-MW Ghent power station in Belgium became the first commercial operator to use the LM6000 fitted with the DLE combustor system, demonstrating 16 ppm NOx, 6 ppm CO, and 1 ppm UHC. The high-time LM6000 engine has accumulated more than 34,000 hours. As of the end of 2002, GE had more than 200 DLE LM engines in operation with almost 3.5 million operating hours.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM6000 DLE combustor employs a triple-dome design with staging of fuel and air flow to achieve lean premixed operation from light-off to full power—using the mid-dome at light-off, with the inner and outer domes brought on progressively as the engine is loaded. The middle and outer domes each consist of 30 premixers; the inner dome has 15. The domes of the combustor are protected from the hot combustion gases by segmented heat shields.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The middle and the inner dome premixers are identical, but the outer premixers are somewhat larger to manage the dome reference velocities in the three combustor domes within a narrow band. Spent cooling air from the heat shield is directed away from the flame-stabilization zones, permitting the combustor to operate at leaner fuel-air ratios. Turbine-nozzle cooling air is utilized to cool the liners convectively on the backside. Combustion acoustics are controlled by the use of passive devices on the exterior of the engine, fuel staging within premixers, and by the use of a control system that senses and alters the combustor operation to limit combustion-generated noise. A small amount of fuel (about 10% of the middle dome flow) is injected into the combustor from holes in the walls of the mixing duct. Another feature, Enhancing Lean Blow Out holes, increase the local fuel-air ratio in the mixing region between recirculating burned gases and fresh, incoming mixture and also provide axial staging of the fuel. The increased fuel-air ratio in the mixing region, along with axial staging, helps to decouple any fuel injection–related acoustic coupling mechanisms (Figure 7).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>7. Individual fuel controls<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec7.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM6000PD has individual fuel controls for each of the combustion system&#8217;s three domes.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: GE Power Systems</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The NOx emissions stay low as the combustor operates lean premixed over the entire operating envelope. CO emissions are less than 25 ppm levels at 50% power on up. UHC emissions are typically less than 10 ppm everywhere except during start-up. Higher emissions are encountered transiently during staging when additional domes are either being lit or extinguished.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM1600, LM2500, and the LM6000 are two-shaft engines. Unlike in single-shaft engines, the compressor discharge temperatures and pressures increase as the load increases. Higher combustor inlet air temperatures result in a decrease in flame quenching and thus the lean blowout limit moves to leaner fuel-air ratios and lower flame temperatures. The combustor can operate with lower flame temperatures as the load is increased. NOx emissions decrease slightly as the load on the engine is increased in the region where the flame temperatures are held constant with airflow control. Once the load increases past the point of airflow control, additional power is produced by simply increasing the flame temperature.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">CO emissions are strongly dependent on the quenching of the CO oxidation process in the neighborhood of the combustor liners. Leakage air from the heat shields also contributes to the early quenching of the CO oxidation reactions. In order to reduce quenching of the CO oxidation reactions in the forward regions of the primary combustion zone, cooling air and leakage airflows in this region have been kept at minimum by the use of advanced cooling technology and materials.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Single-digit NOx<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The only utility-scale gas turbine currently marketed with single-digit NOx guarantees is GE Power Systems&#8217; Frame 7FA outfitted with DLN-2.6. The first of these units was placed in service in March 1996 by Public Service Co of Colorado. The newer model reduced NOx levels from the OEM&#8217;s previous 25-ppm guarantee on the DLN-2 combustor down to 9 ppm. This required 6% more air to pass through the premixers in the combustor due to reductions in cap- and liner-cooling airflows and increased cooling effectiveness.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">However, without changes in the operation of the DLN-2 system, certain penalties would have been incurred for achieving 9 ppm baseload performance. The turndown of a DLN-2 combustor tuned to 9/9 operation (9 ppm NOx/9 ppm CO) was estimated to be about 70% load, compared with 40% load for the 25/15 system. A new combustor configuration was developed based on the DLN-2 burner because of its excellent flame-stabilization characteristics and operating experience. The key feature of the newer configuration is the addition of a sixth burner located in the center of the five existing DLN-2 burners. The presence of the center nozzle enables the DLN-2.6 to extend its 9/9 turndown well beyond the five-nozzle DLN-2.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By fueling the center nozzle separately from the outer nozzles, the fuel-air ratio can be modulated relative to the outer nozzles leading to approximately 200F of turndown from baseload with 9 ppm NOx. Burners were turned and a fourth premixed manifold for injecting quaternary fuel was added to reduce combustion dynamics. The first three premixed manifolds, designated PM1, PM2, and PM3, are configured such that any number of burners can be operated at any time. The PM1 manifold fuels the center nozzle, the PM2 manifold fuels the two outer nozzles located at the cross-fire tubes, and the PM3 manifold fuels the remaining three outer nozzles. The five outer nozzles are identical to those used for the DLN-2, while the center nozzle is similar but with simplified geometry to fit within the available space. Emissions performance of the DLN-2.6 is 9 ppm NOx and CO over a 50% load range.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE recently announced a series of power and efficiency uprates, as well as NOx reductions, to its Frame units. This includes the PG6111FA (the uprated version of the Frame 6FA), which generates 75.9 MW with 15 ppm NOx at a firing temperature of 2,420F. The Frame 6FA machines are manufactured in GE&#8217;s facility in Belfort, France, and are scheduled to start shipping in the second quarter of 2003.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE also introduced the Frame 9FB, a 50-Hz version of the 7FB, which was introduced in 1999. The first 7FB was installed at a Reliant Energy project in Hunterstown, Pa., where it is being tested and is scheduled to enter commercial service in 2003. The Frame 9FB benefits from what GE calls an &#8220;advanced technology flowback&#8221; from the company&#8217;s planned steam-cooled H-class gas turbine. The 9FB will be equipped with GE&#8217;s advanced DLN-2+ combustion system, and NOx emissions will be less than 25 ppm. The Frame 9FB will be available for shipment in early 2004.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Catalytica cleans up<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A technology called catalytic combustion promises to be an alternative to DLN technologies, with even lower NOx levels—below 5 ppm. Catalytica Energy Systems Inc (Mountain View, Calif.) took an early lead in this field in 2000, when it installed its Xonon system on a 1.4-MW Kawasaki gas turbine at Silicon Valley Power&#8217;s (Santa Clara, Calif.) Gianera station. Catalytica recognized that it&#8217;s tough to break into the gas-turbine business with a potentially revolutionary new product, especially when the product lies directly in the gas path. &#8220;Show me an operating turbine and then we&#8217;ll talk,&#8221; was the message.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">So the company went it alone by purchasing a used M1A Kawasaki engine, refurbishing it, and retrofitting its new combustion system designed from scratch. Catalytica did this before Kawasaki Motors Corp USA (Grand Rapids, Mich.) decided to come on board, license the technology, and develop what is now the commercial product. After 14,000 grid-connected hours and a yearlong 8,128-hr testing program, the Silicon Valley Power plant performed better than design. According to Catalytica, the results were:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">NOx emissions of 1.3 ppm (goal was less than 3 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">CO emissions of 0.9 ppm (goal was less than 5 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">UHC emissions of 1.3 ppm (goal was less than 5 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Reliability of 99.2% (goal was 98%)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Availability of 91.2% (goal was 96%)<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Kawasaki Heavy Industries Limited (Hyogo, Japan) produces the 1.4-MW M1A-13A gas turbine (referred to as the M1A-13X when Xonon is installed). The model has an unimpressive thermal efficiency of just 25.5%—equating to a 13,400 Btu/kWh heat rate. But it is convenient for a Xonon retrofit because it has a readily accessible, single, external can-type combustor. The M1A-13A has a pressure ratio of approximately 9.3 to 1, which is comparable to that found in many other industrial gas turbines in the 1- to 6-MW range. Also, the model&#8217;s low mass flowrate (18 lb/sec) allows the catalytic combustor to be maintained as a small system typical of large rig test units, thus reducing the cost of the total system. Finally, its low firing temperature of 1,839F makes the engine ideal for catalytic combustion, because the modest temperatures in the gas-phase burnout zone allow the use of existing liner-cooling technologies.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the Xonon combustion system, compressor discharge air enters an annular plenum prior to entering the preburner. The preburner is a small DLN-type combustor that preheats the combustor air up to the catalyst operating temperature. Fuel is then injected into the warm air and thoroughly mixed before entering the catalyst module. In the catalyst module, some of the fuel-air mixture is combusted through a flameless catalytic process. The combustion process continues in the burnout zone until all of the remaining uncombusted fuel is reacted (Figure 8).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>8. Catalytic combustor<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec8.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytic combustors burn lean fuel-air mixtures to achieve sub-5 ppm NOx. The maximum combustor exit temperature is 2,460F or lower—well below the NOx-formation temperature.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Catalytica Energy Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">According to Catalytica, its technology is superior if your target is 5 ppm NOx or less, meaning the life-cycle cost of a Xonon-equipped gas turbine is less than that for the same gas turbine equipped with a selective catalytic reduction system. The manufacturer points out that spent Xonon catalysts, which are expected to be depleted annually, are nontoxic and can be recycled to recover precious metals.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The OEM successfully completed an Equipment and Process Precertification Program administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which verified the air quality–related performance claims of its Xonon Cool Combustion system last August. The Equipment and Process Precertification Program is a voluntary statewide program administered by CARB through which manufacturers of products that have a beneficial impact on air quality can have their product&#8217;s performance claims independently verified. The objective of the program is to simplify the permitting process by providing advanced independent evaluation of a technology, which can then be used as the basis for BACT (best available control technology) determination.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Last year, Xonon shipped catalysts for what was scheduled to be the first three commercial Xonon-equipped Kawasaki gas turbines for a government healthcare facility in Jamaica Plain, Mass. However, the plant was being developed by an Enron subsidiary, and the project was shelved after the turbines were shipped. After the three turbines had sat idle for over a year, Kawasaki repurchased them at an auction of Enron assets.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first commercial application of Catalytica&#8217;s Xonon technology now is the Sonoma Developmental Center in Eldridge, Calif., where an existing Kawasaki M1A-13D gas turbine was retrofitted with a Kawasaki-designed Xonon-based combustor (Figure 9). The 12-yr-old unit provides supplemental heat and power for a staff of 2,200 and 850 residents across 120 buildings.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>9. First commercial catalytic combustor installation<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec9.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The Sonoma Developmental Center is the first commercial catalytic combustor installation. A 12-yr-old Kawasaki gas turbine was retrofit with a Catalytica-licensed catalyst. Post-startup testing confirms that the 1.3-MW plant is operating at less than 3 ppmv NOx, less than 10 ppm CO, and less than 2 ppm VOC.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Catalytica Energy Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The six-week retrofit involved removing the current M1A-13D engine operating with a DLE combustor configuration, and replacing it with an advanced M1A-13X engine incorporating Xonon Cool Combustion. The reconfigured unit returned to service in November 2002. Post-startup testing confirms the 1.3-MW plant is operating at less than 3 ppm NOx—an overall 90% reduction. Additionally, the Xonon Cool Combustion system makes it possible for Kawasaki to guarantee CO levels of less than 10 ppm and VOC levels of less than 2 ppm.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytica announced in December the purchase of a Kawasaki 1.4-MW GPB15X equipped with Xonon technology. The unit is part of a heating and cooling plant for the Reader&#8217;s Digest 650,000-square-foot global headquarters in Pleasantville, N.Y., servicing approximately 1,000 employees. The plant is expected to be in service by this July.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytica reports that it also has demonstrated sub-5 ppm NOx levels on gas turbines manufactured by Rolls-Royce Allison (Indianapolis, Ind.). GE Power Systems plans to begin shipment of a Xonon-equipped 11-MW GE10 gas turbine in 2004. String testing is scheduled in Florence, Italy, this year with orders beginning this fall. Emissions targets for the GE10 are 3 ppm NOx, 100 ppm CO, and 10 ppm VOC.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By Dr. Robert Peltier PE, Sr. Editor</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=80&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec1.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec2.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec3.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec4.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec5.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec6.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec7.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec8.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec9.png" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oyster Creek Power 8, Freeport, Texas</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Combined Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low emission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operated and maintained by Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Texas
Owned by Dynegy (50%) and American National Power (50%)

Sub-10 ppm NOx has been the dream of gas turbine users for many years, and currently there is only one OEM that can deliver on that promise. But OEMs are no longer the only suppliers of NOx retrofit hardware. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=49&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Operated and maintained by Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Texas</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Owned by Dynegy (50%) and American National Power (50%)<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Sub-10 ppm NOx has been the dream of gas turbine users for many years, and currently there is only one OEM that can deliver on that promise. But OEMs are no longer the only suppliers of NOx retrofit hardware. Power Systems Manufacturing has developed a sub-5 ppm NOx retrofit kit for the GE 7EA that has taken dry low-NOx technology to the next level. Dow Chemical took a chance with the new technology and now operates the world&#8217;s cleanest—in terms of NOx—gas turbine.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By Troy Bearden and Curtis Banks, Dow Chemical Co.&#8217;s Texas Operations<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Power 8 at Dow&#8217;s Oyster Creek site consists of three natural gas–fired GE Frame 7EAs and a 200-MW double extraction full condensing steam turbine originally commissioned between July and November 1994. The units are baseloaded and operate under power production contracts, although their primary use is to generate steam for Dow Chemical. The plant is capable of producing 440 MW. Dow supplies steam and power to the other plants at Oyster Creek and Plant A. Oyster Creek&#8217;s Power 8 is the newest of four powerhouses Dow operates at Freeport.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Oyster Creek Power 8 is not only the newest plant in the Dow Chemical fleet; it also has the lowest NOx emissions. The original dry low-NOx (DLN) 1.0 system ran about 12.6 ppm NOx and 3.3 ppm CO during normal operation at baseload. With the auxiliary duct burner–fired HRSGs, Power 8 is just barely going to make the NOx reductions required by state air pollution control authorities, assuming planned duct burner NOx reductions continue on schedule. The state NOx reduction plan requires a plantwide 80% reduction in NOx by 2008.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Lower NOx limits drove project<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The project began over two and a half years ago when new Houston-area emission regulations were introduced to reduce NOx in incremental steps through 2008. For Dow, the lower limits meant it would have to make significant improvement in NOx reductions from its fleet of gas turbines and gas-fired HRSGs. After considering a variety of alternatives, Dow finally settled on standard selective catalytic reduction (SCR) with some form of ammonia injection. This approach was selected because the technology is well understood and has low technical risk. However, its installation and maintenance costs would be high, especially due to Power 8&#8217;s small site.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Power Systems Manufacturing (PSM) first began pitching its proprietary Low Emissions Combustor III (LEC III) early in 2001. But because the technology had no track record, the proposals didn&#8217;t get very far with Dow&#8217;s pragmatic operating staff. Dow&#8217;s refinery must operate reliably, and the possibility of any interruption of power and steam production was just too large a risk to take on an unproven technology.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the meantime, PSM won a contract with TransAlta Cogeneration LP&#8217;s Fort Saskatchewan plant in Alberta, Canada. Fort Saskatchewan is a combined-cycle cogeneration plant that produces 120 MW of electricity and 100 tons/hr of process steam for a Dow Chemical facility. Prior to the turbine retrofit, the plant was having trouble getting NOx any lower than 17 ppm, and CO was fixed around 14 ppm. After installation of the LEC III system, EnTech Environmental certified 6-ppm NOx emissions and an average of 2.5 ppm of CO.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>1. Low-emission combustor.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first application of Power Systems Manufacturing&#8217;s low-emissions combustor on a 7EA turbine was at TransAlta Cogeneration LP&#8217;s Fort Saskatchewan plant in Alberta, Canada. Prior to the retrofit, the plant operated no lower than 17 ppm NOx and 14 ppm of CO. Afterwards, certified tests showed 6-ppm NOx emissions and an average of 2.5 ppm of CO.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>2. Quick change.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Retrofitting of the LEC components took only a few days. Installation of the LEC hardware began on March 20 and was piggybacked on other turbine repairs. The turbine was buttoned up on April 11 and started up the next morning.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By the end of 2001, the replacement hardware was installed and producing 5.8-ppm dry NOx with no tweaking of fuel/air ratios. By September 2002, the hardware had run for 8,000 hours, maintaining 5.8 ppm NOx. A 24,000-hour major overhaul removed the hardware and returned it to PSM for refurbishment. Reinstallation is planned for September 2004. TransAlta was ecstatic not only about the results—the life increased to 16,000 hours of operation before refurbishment, compared with the 12,000-hour OEM limit—but also about the system&#8217;s 40% cost savings.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">That was the kind of operating data that Dow needed to see to make a commitment to PSM for its LEC III technology. By January 2002, Dow invited PSM back for another sales pitch. This time PSM offered an 8-ppm guarantee for the simple reason that GE guarantees 9 ppm on the 7EA with DLN 1.0. Although the designs are significantly different in the way fuel and air are mixed prior to combustion; GE&#8217;s venturi in the liner is not 100% premix, whereas PSM&#8217;s low-emission combustor (LEC) is.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A deal was finally struck in November 2002 with several interesting requirements: the performance contract will include 8 ppm NOx as the guarantee point, but the design target will be 5 ppm, and PSM will work to reach that goal until both parties agree that no further reductions are practical. The schedule was tight; parts were due on the site on January 2 of this year. But because Dow requires that at least two of the three Frame 7EAs be operational at any time, other issues delayed the major outage until March 20, at which time the PSM hardware installation would be piggybacked on other planned major repairs. By April 8 the other repairs were completed and the LEC assemblies were installed. The turbine was buttoned up on April 11 and placed on turning gear that night, with startup scheduled for the morning.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Results count<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Startup was uneventful, but the NOx readings caused quite a stir. Using default fuel splits of 81% primary/19% secondary, NOx readings were 6.75 ppm and CO was approximately 9 ppm at baseload power and 2,055ºF conditions. Tuning the splits over the next couple of days gave the engineers a better handle on the sensitivity of the system, and they arrived at a final split of 84%/16% with 4.75 ppm NOx and negligible CO using EPA-certified emissions test instruments within a week of initial installation of the LEC III—and meeting PSM&#8217;s design target of 5.0 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">This is an industry first for GE&#8217;s Frame 7EA turbine emissions control. Full turndown capability was maintained, and, at low part-load operation, the LEC system achieved emissions levels similar to baseload operation. Even more important, the performance of the LEC gave Dow the option to cancel the SCR, saving millions of dollars in capital costs and eliminating the complexity of an additional piece of hardware.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Dow Chemical Co.&#8217;s Curtis Banks says, &#8220;In the future, we intend to use PSM&#8217;s next-generation fuel nozzle technology and expect to see an additional 10% reduction in NOx, perhaps down to 4.2 ppm. I was also very impressed with PSM and its dedicated staff and the strict attention to detail displayed during the design and installation of this system. There was no extra down time associated with the LEC installation during our hot gas path inspection.&#8221;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Banks adds that, &#8220;as a matter of fact, I found out about PSM&#8217;s new LEC-III system by reading about it in POWER.&#8221; Perhaps that was the first step in Oyster Creek Power 8 becoming a Top Plant for 2003.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>3. Low emissions.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Less than 5 ppm NOx and negligible CO using EPA-certified emissions test instruments were achieved within a week of initial installation of the LEC III at the Oyster Creek plant.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>4. Key staff.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek4.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Troy Bearden, Power 8 plant manager (left), and Curtis Banks, technical adviser for Dow Chemical&#8217;s Texas Operations (right), standing in Power 8&#8217;s control room. Power 8 is owned by the Oyster Creek Limited Partnership and is run and maintained by Dow Chemical. It is located at the Oyster Creek site of Dow Chemical&#8217;s Texas Operations in Freeport, Texas.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Dow Chemical</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=49&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek1.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek2.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek3.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek4.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>