<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Power Generation &#187; New Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powergen.wordpress.com/category/new-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='powergen.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>Canadian utility mixes oil and water</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/canadian-utility-mixes-oil-and-water/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/canadian-utility-mixes-oil-and-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/canadian-utility-mixes-oil-and-water/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NB Power&#8217;s (Fredericton, N.B.) 1,050-MW Coleson Cove station has received approval to begin a $475-million refurbishment that includes a fuel switch from heavy oil to Orimulsion, environmental equipment upgrades, and a new pipeline and offshore unloading system to deliver the fuel to the plant. The upgrades to the three identical units at the plant are [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=82&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span><br />
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">NB Power&#8217;s (Fredericton, N.B.) 1,050-MW Coleson Cove station has received approval to begin a $475-million refurbishment that includes a fuel switch from heavy oil to Orimulsion, environmental equipment upgrades, and a new pipeline and offshore unloading system to deliver the fuel to the plant. The upgrades to the three identical units at the plant are required to meet new environmental standards that take effect in 2005. Coleson Cove, located in the Lorneville area of west Saint John, currently supplies over 30% of New Brunswick&#8217;s electrical power. The upgrade project is scheduled for completion in the fall of 2004.</span></span></p>
<p><span id="more-82"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><span>Orimulsion is a liquid fossil fuel consisting of 70% bitumen and 30% water. Bitumen is a highly viscous, naturally occurring petroleum hydrocarbon from the Orinoco belt region of Venezuela. To facilitate pumping and transportation (a larger pipeline to carry the additional mass flow is required), the natural bitumen must be mixed with water.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><span>Coleson Cove will become the second powerplant in North America to use Orimulsion; NB Power has successfully used Orimulsion at its 300-MW Dalhousie station since 1994.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><span>&#8220;The impact of Coleson Cove on the environment was a major factor in approving this project,&#8221; Environment and Local Government Minister Kim Jardine said. &#8220;The refurbishment will reduce SO2 emissions by 77%, particulate matter by 75%, and NOx by 70%. We can pay for the new NOx controls, flue gas desulphurization scrubbers, and wet electrostatic precipitator upgrades to the plant by switching fuel sources from heavy oil to Orimulsion.&#8221;<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><span>In addition to NB Power, other power producers firing Orimulsion include Energi E2 in Denmark; RWE Systems in Germany; Lithuanian State Power System; ENEL in Italy; Hokkaido Electric Power and Kashima Kita Electric Power in Japan; China National United Oil Corp in the People&#8217;s Republic of China; and PowerSeraya in Singapore.<br />
</span></span><span><br />
</span></p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/82/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/82/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/82/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/82/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/82/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/82/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=82&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/canadian-utility-mixes-oil-and-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Control system upgrades can save big bucks</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/control-system-upgrades-can-save-big-bucks/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/control-system-upgrades-can-save-big-bucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/control-system-upgrades-can-save-big-bucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision to upgrade powerplant control systems is not a simple one; however, the economic payoff can be substantial. Recent studies by Siemens Westinghouse (Newcastle, UK) indicate that improvements in plant performance thorough controls modernization can be substantial. For a typical 540-MW coal-fired powerplant, instrumentation and controls changes are projected to save a combined $1.8 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=81&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:12pt;">The decision to upgrade powerplant control systems is not a simple one; however, the economic payoff can be substantial. Recent studies by Siemens Westinghouse (Newcastle, UK) indicate that improvements in plant performance thorough controls modernization can be substantial. For a typical 540-MW coal-fired powerplant, instrumentation and controls changes are projected to save a combined $1.8 million per year:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:12pt;">Fuel savings during normal operation: 0.4%—or $283,000/yr—is possible, mostly from tighter steam-temperature control, more accurate combustion and oxygen control, and conversion from fixed-pressure to sliding-pressure operation.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:12pt;">Fuel savings during startup: 50%—approximately $17,000/yr—is possible. Automated controls enable a plant to adhere more closely to stress limitations.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:12pt;">Fuel savings during load ramps: It is possible to achieve load-ramp rates of 5% of MCR/min above 60% load and 3%/min between 35% and 60% load. Improved ramp rates allow the unit to respond faster, thus &#8220;catching&#8221; higher market prices and reducing load quicker when the market prices drop. Savings are estimated at $532,000/yr.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:12pt;">Fuel savings due to reduced forced-outage rates: National Electric Reliability Council data indicate that the average forced outage rate for a coal-fired unit lasts about 20 hours. If a plant can reduce that figure by more intelligent controls, safe run-back to partial loads instead of a trip, and improvements in trip-system reliability, then it can save just over $1 million/yr.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=81&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/control-system-upgrades-can-save-big-bucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas turbine combustors drive emissions toward nil</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[




Best available control technology continues to be ratcheted down to achieve ever-lower NOx emissions. Some dry low-NOx combustors can achieve 9 ppm without post-combustion control, while newer catalytic combustors are operating below 5 ppm NOx.

In the late 1980s, gas turbine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to integrate dry low-NOx (DLN)—also referred to as dry low-emission [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=80&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-top:7px;padding-left:7px;padding-right:7px;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Best available control technology continues to be ratcheted down to achieve ever-lower NOx emissions. Some dry low-NOx combustors can achieve 9 ppm without post-combustion control, while newer catalytic combustors are operating below 5 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the late 1980s, gas turbine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) began to integrate dry low-NOx (DLN)—also referred to as dry low-emission (DLE)—combustion technology into their product lines to eliminate the need for steam or water injection, which had been the traditional method of NOx control. Many DLN technologies were evaluated, and lean premixed combustion emerged as the most promising approach for near-term application.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-80"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Throughout the next decade, lean premixed combustors installed in new models and retrofits to existing units dramatically slashed NOx emissions compared with conventional diffusion flame technology (Figure 1). But, like so many things in nature, the benefits of NOx reduction came at a price. Because the optimum flame temperature of a lean premixed combustor is close to the lean flammability limit, combustor performance is characterized by a CO/NOx tradeoff. At the combustor design point, both CO and NOx are below target levels; however, deviations from the design flame temperature cause emissions to increase. This tradeoff becomes particularly important during part-load turbine operation, when the combustor is required to run even leaner (Figure 2, p. 24).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>1. NOx limits<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec1.png?w=32&#038;h=50" alt="" width="32" height="50" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Best available control technology (BACT) NOx limits have plummeted in the past 20 years. Will 5 ppm NOx soon become the national standard?<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: U.S. Department of Energy</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The power output of a gas turbine is directly related to the firing temperature, which is directly related to flame temperature and the rate of thermal NOx formation. The formation of NOx increases dramatically when the temperature exceeds 2,900F on natural gas. Because traditional diffusion flame combustor temperatures can exceed 4,000F for brief periods, it is virtually impossible to achieve ultra-low NOx levels when a turbine is fired with a diffusion flame combustor.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Key: Low flame temps<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Low emissions of NOx, as well as CO, can be achieved with thorough fuel-air mixing and control of the adiabatic flame temperature below about 3,000F. If, on the other hand, the peak combustion temperature can be limited to about 2,800F, NOx levels can be less than a few parts per million (ppm). Unfortunately, at fuel-air ratios low enough to achieve such low NOx concentrations, flames are highly unstable and are susceptible to flame-out or fluctuations, which can cause severe combustor vibrations and fatigue failure of combustion components.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In contrast to lean premixed combustion, an alternative technology known as &#8220;catalytic combustion&#8221; does not involve issues of flame stability. The fuel-air ratio entering the catalyst simply needs to be high enough to generate the desired turbine-inlet temperature at full conversion of the fuel.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">One of the great difficulties with lean premixed systems is maintaining flame stability in the narrow flame temperature range between high NOx production and lean flame extinction. Aerodynamically stabilized injectors have very narrow ranges of operation, necessitating multiple burner staging (up to four stages in some systems) or piloting. Many turbine manufacturers have refined their DLN systems to sub-25 ppm NOx levels, and some Frame units have achieved single-digit, or sub-10 ppm, NOx levels.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Whereas the U.S. spends millions for increased capital and maintenance costs for the latest DLN technology and postcombustion cleanup equipment to reach ever-lower NOx limits at virtually all powerplants, the European Union has taken a different approach: The EU sets NOx limits based on plant efficiency. For example, the NOx requirement for simple-cycle units with an efficiency greater than 35% is approximately 24 ppm on natural gas and 58 ppm on liquid fuels. Gaseous fuels other than natural gas have a limit of 58 ppm.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">NOx limits are less stringent for gas turbines used in combined heat and power systems demonstrating an overall efficiency greater than 75% and for combined-cycle plants demonstrating an annual average electrical efficiency greater than 55%.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Solar does DLE<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first two prototype production DLE systems manufactured by Solar Turbines Inc (San Diego, Calif.) were installed in 1992 for field evaluation. These were a Centaur 50S gas turbine, rated 4.1 MW, at El Paso Natural Gas Co&#8217;s Window Rock Station near Window Rock, Ariz., and a Mars 100S gas turbine, rated 10.5 MW, at the Pacific Gas Transmission station near Rosalia, Wash. Initially, high combustion pressure oscillations limited operation to 42 ppm NOx. The oscillations were controlled in the short term by raising pilot fuel flow, but this increased NOx and CO. The pilot fuel injector circuit is used mainly for light-off and low-load operation. During light-off and low-load operation, approximately 30% to 50% of the fuel passes through the pilot injector, providing a rich fuel-air mixture and improved combustion stability. Above 50% load, the pilot fuel is reduced to less than 5% of the total fuel flow to optimize emissions performance (Figure 3, p. 26).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>2. Emissions compromises<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec2.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Combustor design is a series of compromises between robust operation at all loads versus lower NOx and CO. Lean combustion also increases combustion noise–caused fatigue failure of combustion components in early DLN systems.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Source: Platts</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>3. Dry low-emission (DLE) fuel injectors<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec3.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">DLE fuel injectors are significantly larger than conventional ones due to the higher airflow through the injector air swirler and the required volume of the premixing chamber. The injector module includes a premixing main fuel injector and a pilot fuel injector.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Design of Solar&#8217;s fuel injector premixing section was optimized by the mid-1990s. This reduced combustor pressure oscillations and, when combined with injector design improvements, enabled emissions warranties of 25 ppm NOx on natural gas and 96 ppm NOx on liquid fuels. This guarantee was extended to all of Solar&#8217;s models.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In 2001, an augmented backside-cooled combustor liner was incorporated into the OEM&#8217;s Centaur 50S and Taurus 60S models, allowing a further emissions reduction to 15 ppm NOx and 25 ppm CO from 50 to 100% load, following more than 22,000 hrs of field testing.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The most significant difference in Solar Turbines&#8217; new lean premixed combustor liner is the increased combustor volume required for low CO and unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) emissions at the lower overall flame temperature. Because combustor length was constrained by field retrofit opportunities, the only option was to increase the diameter of the combustor liner. A second difference is the absence of large air injection ports in the combustor primary zone. All air used in the combustion process is introduced through the air swirler of the fuel injectors (Figure 4, p. 26).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>4. Larger-diameter combustor liners<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec4.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The increased volume of the DLE combustor required the diameter to increase while holding the length constant so existing engines could be retrofitted. High- time DLE combustor liners have more than 39,000 operating hours.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The new DLE combustor incorporates the capability to regulate the combustor airflow and pilot fuel flow over the entire engine-operating map. The requirement to control these two parameters has added a degree of complexity to the control system that is not required in a conventional gas turbine. During start-up and low-load operation, the pilot flow rate has been optimized to achieve maximum flame stability to handle load transients. Below 50% load the combustor airflow is managed in the same way as in a conventional engine. Above 50% rated load, Solar&#8217;s DLE engine enters the &#8220;low emissions mode,&#8221; modulating either the bleed valves or inlet guide vanes to keep the combustion primary zone temperature within a specified range. Solar&#8217;s DLE gas turbine controls use the power turbine inlet temperature as an indirect measurement of the primary zone temperature to control the bleed valve or inlet guide vane position as a function of turbine load (Figure 5).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>5. SoLoNOx system<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec5.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A Centaur 50 gas turbine with a dual-fuel SoLoNOx system supplies power and heat to a district energy system in Germany.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Solar Turbines Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Local ambient conditions also affect emissions. NOx is observed to increase with increasing ambient temperature, decreasing relative humidity, and increasing barometric pressure, whereas CO emissions trend in the opposite way. However, field experience has shown that relative humidity and barometric pressure have only a small effect on the combustor primary zone temperature and, therefore, a small influence on emissions from DLE gas turbines. In practice, emissions from DLE packages vary less than 5 ppm from 0F to 120F. Many DLE packages are configured to increase pilot fuel flow at temperatures below 68F to augment flame stability. Below 0F, NOx and CO emissions increase.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Further reductions<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Future emissions reductions mean developing new technologies to take up where DLE leaves off. One area being explored by Solar Turbines is a surface-stabilized fuel injector for use with lean, premixed combustors. Developed by Alzeta Corp (Santa Clara, Calif.), surface-stabilized fuel injectors provide extended turndown and ultra-low NOx emission performance.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The new injectors form interacting radiant and blue-flame zones immediately above a selectively perforated porous metal surface. This allows stable operation at low reaction temperatures. A proof-of-concept injector in a full-pressure test rig at the U.S. DOE&#8217;s National Energy Technology Laboratory in Morgantown, W.Va., achieved sub-3 ppm NOx emissions with concurrent single-digit CO emissions. Operating conditions ranged between inlet pressures of 26.5 psia and 180 psia, inlet temperatures between 186F and 850F, and calculated adiabatic flame temperatures between 2,670F and 2,900F. Testing with prototype fuel injectors in test rigs at Solar Turbines yielded similar results. In May 2001, the OEM&#8217;s 1-MW Saturn gas turbine was operated to 95% load with a surface-stabilized injector. Currently, Alzeta and Solar Turbines are completing a multi-burner annular combustor test, which will then proceed to an engine test later this year. In addition, the companies have initiated a project to apply Alzeta&#8217;s nanoSTAR technology to the Titan 130 gas turbine.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Mitsubishi hits 15<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Mitsubishi Power Systems Inc&#8217;s (Lake Mary, Fla.) first DLN combustor was introduced in 1984 on a 50-Hz M701D gas turbine. By 1992, 25-ppm NOx levels were being commercially achieved in the OEM&#8217;s F-class turbine operating at full load, with a turbine inlet temperature of 2,460F.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Mitsubishi&#8217;s F-class fleet experience with DLN combustors now exceeds 1.5 million hours of meeting the 25 ppm NOx limit. The OEM reports that recent tests have achieved 15 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The pilot nozzle and air bypass valve in this combustor make it possible to sustain a stable flame and accurately control the fuel-air ratio. The main nozzles are composed of air swirlers together with a fuel nozzle. The swirlers introduce highly turbulent air, causing complete mixing of gas and air, while the pilot nozzle allows stable combustion of the premixed gas by diffusion firing. A cone attached at the tip makes flame holding stable by recirculating combustion gases. The air bypass valve, infusing air directly into the transition piece, is installed at the transition piece, enabling an almost constant fuel-air ratio at various operating conditions, such as ignition, acceleration, and partial-load operation (Figure 6).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>6. Contrasting cooling schemes<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec6.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The cooling scheme in Mitsubishi&#8217;s F-class turbine uses proprietary &#8220;Platfin&#8221; cooling of the combustor basket, and &#8220;Mtfin&#8221; is used at transition piece. Around 10% of available air is used for cooling, and the rest is used for combustion. The G-class combustor uses steam for cooling (bottom).<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Mitsubishi Power Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In 1996, a steam-cooled DLN combustor was developed for Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class gas turbines. The M501G and M701G models feature a turbine inlet temperature of 2,730F and are designed to achieve a combined-cycle plant efficiency of greater than 58%. Prototype testing has shown the G series to be capable of 25 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">To increase the turbine inlet temperature to 2,730F, almost all of the compressed air is needed for combustion, and steam is introduced to perform the cooling. (In conventional gas turbines, much of the compressed air is diverted to cool hot-gas-path components.) Overall, Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class combustor has nearly the same configuration as its F class, except at the combustor basket, where the transition piece integrates the basket part and the liner. The cooling steam, supplied from a required bottoming steam cycle, cools that structure over the entire surface area of the combustor.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The M701G1 combustion chamber and first- and second-stage blades and vanes are similar to those used in the prototype 501G design, but the size has been increased to give a higher output. The 701G1 is a single-shaft machine with the generator at the compressor end of the turbine to allow the turbine exhaust to be directed into the heat-recovery steam generator. The turbine combustion chamber uses steam cooling to maintain temperature in the range 2,730F to 2,910F to keep NOx emissions at 25 ppm or less. Mitsubishi&#8217;s G-class fleet experience exceeds 75,000 hours on seven units.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Aero engines<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE Power Systems&#8217; (Atlanta, Ga.) DLE combustors have been developed for GE&#8217;s aeroderivative gas turbines—the gas-fueled 44-MW LM6000, the 23-MW LM2500, and the double annular 15-MW LM1600. Twenty-five ppm has been successfully demonstrated for the entire family of LM DLE products.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Factory testing of components and engine assembly on the first 41-MW DLE LM6000 gas turbine was completed in 1994 and demonstrated less than 15 ppm NOx, 10 ppm CO, and 2 ppm UHC at a firing temperature of 2,350F. In 1995, the 43-MW Ghent power station in Belgium became the first commercial operator to use the LM6000 fitted with the DLE combustor system, demonstrating 16 ppm NOx, 6 ppm CO, and 1 ppm UHC. The high-time LM6000 engine has accumulated more than 34,000 hours. As of the end of 2002, GE had more than 200 DLE LM engines in operation with almost 3.5 million operating hours.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM6000 DLE combustor employs a triple-dome design with staging of fuel and air flow to achieve lean premixed operation from light-off to full power—using the mid-dome at light-off, with the inner and outer domes brought on progressively as the engine is loaded. The middle and outer domes each consist of 30 premixers; the inner dome has 15. The domes of the combustor are protected from the hot combustion gases by segmented heat shields.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The middle and the inner dome premixers are identical, but the outer premixers are somewhat larger to manage the dome reference velocities in the three combustor domes within a narrow band. Spent cooling air from the heat shield is directed away from the flame-stabilization zones, permitting the combustor to operate at leaner fuel-air ratios. Turbine-nozzle cooling air is utilized to cool the liners convectively on the backside. Combustion acoustics are controlled by the use of passive devices on the exterior of the engine, fuel staging within premixers, and by the use of a control system that senses and alters the combustor operation to limit combustion-generated noise. A small amount of fuel (about 10% of the middle dome flow) is injected into the combustor from holes in the walls of the mixing duct. Another feature, Enhancing Lean Blow Out holes, increase the local fuel-air ratio in the mixing region between recirculating burned gases and fresh, incoming mixture and also provide axial staging of the fuel. The increased fuel-air ratio in the mixing region, along with axial staging, helps to decouple any fuel injection–related acoustic coupling mechanisms (Figure 7).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>7. Individual fuel controls<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec7.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM6000PD has individual fuel controls for each of the combustion system&#8217;s three domes.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: GE Power Systems</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The NOx emissions stay low as the combustor operates lean premixed over the entire operating envelope. CO emissions are less than 25 ppm levels at 50% power on up. UHC emissions are typically less than 10 ppm everywhere except during start-up. Higher emissions are encountered transiently during staging when additional domes are either being lit or extinguished.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The LM1600, LM2500, and the LM6000 are two-shaft engines. Unlike in single-shaft engines, the compressor discharge temperatures and pressures increase as the load increases. Higher combustor inlet air temperatures result in a decrease in flame quenching and thus the lean blowout limit moves to leaner fuel-air ratios and lower flame temperatures. The combustor can operate with lower flame temperatures as the load is increased. NOx emissions decrease slightly as the load on the engine is increased in the region where the flame temperatures are held constant with airflow control. Once the load increases past the point of airflow control, additional power is produced by simply increasing the flame temperature.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">CO emissions are strongly dependent on the quenching of the CO oxidation process in the neighborhood of the combustor liners. Leakage air from the heat shields also contributes to the early quenching of the CO oxidation reactions. In order to reduce quenching of the CO oxidation reactions in the forward regions of the primary combustion zone, cooling air and leakage airflows in this region have been kept at minimum by the use of advanced cooling technology and materials.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Single-digit NOx<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The only utility-scale gas turbine currently marketed with single-digit NOx guarantees is GE Power Systems&#8217; Frame 7FA outfitted with DLN-2.6. The first of these units was placed in service in March 1996 by Public Service Co of Colorado. The newer model reduced NOx levels from the OEM&#8217;s previous 25-ppm guarantee on the DLN-2 combustor down to 9 ppm. This required 6% more air to pass through the premixers in the combustor due to reductions in cap- and liner-cooling airflows and increased cooling effectiveness.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">However, without changes in the operation of the DLN-2 system, certain penalties would have been incurred for achieving 9 ppm baseload performance. The turndown of a DLN-2 combustor tuned to 9/9 operation (9 ppm NOx/9 ppm CO) was estimated to be about 70% load, compared with 40% load for the 25/15 system. A new combustor configuration was developed based on the DLN-2 burner because of its excellent flame-stabilization characteristics and operating experience. The key feature of the newer configuration is the addition of a sixth burner located in the center of the five existing DLN-2 burners. The presence of the center nozzle enables the DLN-2.6 to extend its 9/9 turndown well beyond the five-nozzle DLN-2.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By fueling the center nozzle separately from the outer nozzles, the fuel-air ratio can be modulated relative to the outer nozzles leading to approximately 200F of turndown from baseload with 9 ppm NOx. Burners were turned and a fourth premixed manifold for injecting quaternary fuel was added to reduce combustion dynamics. The first three premixed manifolds, designated PM1, PM2, and PM3, are configured such that any number of burners can be operated at any time. The PM1 manifold fuels the center nozzle, the PM2 manifold fuels the two outer nozzles located at the cross-fire tubes, and the PM3 manifold fuels the remaining three outer nozzles. The five outer nozzles are identical to those used for the DLN-2, while the center nozzle is similar but with simplified geometry to fit within the available space. Emissions performance of the DLN-2.6 is 9 ppm NOx and CO over a 50% load range.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE recently announced a series of power and efficiency uprates, as well as NOx reductions, to its Frame units. This includes the PG6111FA (the uprated version of the Frame 6FA), which generates 75.9 MW with 15 ppm NOx at a firing temperature of 2,420F. The Frame 6FA machines are manufactured in GE&#8217;s facility in Belfort, France, and are scheduled to start shipping in the second quarter of 2003.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">GE also introduced the Frame 9FB, a 50-Hz version of the 7FB, which was introduced in 1999. The first 7FB was installed at a Reliant Energy project in Hunterstown, Pa., where it is being tested and is scheduled to enter commercial service in 2003. The Frame 9FB benefits from what GE calls an &#8220;advanced technology flowback&#8221; from the company&#8217;s planned steam-cooled H-class gas turbine. The 9FB will be equipped with GE&#8217;s advanced DLN-2+ combustion system, and NOx emissions will be less than 25 ppm. The Frame 9FB will be available for shipment in early 2004.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Catalytica cleans up<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A technology called catalytic combustion promises to be an alternative to DLN technologies, with even lower NOx levels—below 5 ppm. Catalytica Energy Systems Inc (Mountain View, Calif.) took an early lead in this field in 2000, when it installed its Xonon system on a 1.4-MW Kawasaki gas turbine at Silicon Valley Power&#8217;s (Santa Clara, Calif.) Gianera station. Catalytica recognized that it&#8217;s tough to break into the gas-turbine business with a potentially revolutionary new product, especially when the product lies directly in the gas path. &#8220;Show me an operating turbine and then we&#8217;ll talk,&#8221; was the message.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">So the company went it alone by purchasing a used M1A Kawasaki engine, refurbishing it, and retrofitting its new combustion system designed from scratch. Catalytica did this before Kawasaki Motors Corp USA (Grand Rapids, Mich.) decided to come on board, license the technology, and develop what is now the commercial product. After 14,000 grid-connected hours and a yearlong 8,128-hr testing program, the Silicon Valley Power plant performed better than design. According to Catalytica, the results were:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">NOx emissions of 1.3 ppm (goal was less than 3 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">CO emissions of 0.9 ppm (goal was less than 5 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">UHC emissions of 1.3 ppm (goal was less than 5 ppm)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Reliability of 99.2% (goal was 98%)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Availability of 91.2% (goal was 96%)<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Kawasaki Heavy Industries Limited (Hyogo, Japan) produces the 1.4-MW M1A-13A gas turbine (referred to as the M1A-13X when Xonon is installed). The model has an unimpressive thermal efficiency of just 25.5%—equating to a 13,400 Btu/kWh heat rate. But it is convenient for a Xonon retrofit because it has a readily accessible, single, external can-type combustor. The M1A-13A has a pressure ratio of approximately 9.3 to 1, which is comparable to that found in many other industrial gas turbines in the 1- to 6-MW range. Also, the model&#8217;s low mass flowrate (18 lb/sec) allows the catalytic combustor to be maintained as a small system typical of large rig test units, thus reducing the cost of the total system. Finally, its low firing temperature of 1,839F makes the engine ideal for catalytic combustion, because the modest temperatures in the gas-phase burnout zone allow the use of existing liner-cooling technologies.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the Xonon combustion system, compressor discharge air enters an annular plenum prior to entering the preburner. The preburner is a small DLN-type combustor that preheats the combustor air up to the catalyst operating temperature. Fuel is then injected into the warm air and thoroughly mixed before entering the catalyst module. In the catalyst module, some of the fuel-air mixture is combusted through a flameless catalytic process. The combustion process continues in the burnout zone until all of the remaining uncombusted fuel is reacted (Figure 8).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>8. Catalytic combustor<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec8.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytic combustors burn lean fuel-air mixtures to achieve sub-5 ppm NOx. The maximum combustor exit temperature is 2,460F or lower—well below the NOx-formation temperature.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Catalytica Energy Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">According to Catalytica, its technology is superior if your target is 5 ppm NOx or less, meaning the life-cycle cost of a Xonon-equipped gas turbine is less than that for the same gas turbine equipped with a selective catalytic reduction system. The manufacturer points out that spent Xonon catalysts, which are expected to be depleted annually, are nontoxic and can be recycled to recover precious metals.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The OEM successfully completed an Equipment and Process Precertification Program administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which verified the air quality–related performance claims of its Xonon Cool Combustion system last August. The Equipment and Process Precertification Program is a voluntary statewide program administered by CARB through which manufacturers of products that have a beneficial impact on air quality can have their product&#8217;s performance claims independently verified. The objective of the program is to simplify the permitting process by providing advanced independent evaluation of a technology, which can then be used as the basis for BACT (best available control technology) determination.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Last year, Xonon shipped catalysts for what was scheduled to be the first three commercial Xonon-equipped Kawasaki gas turbines for a government healthcare facility in Jamaica Plain, Mass. However, the plant was being developed by an Enron subsidiary, and the project was shelved after the turbines were shipped. After the three turbines had sat idle for over a year, Kawasaki repurchased them at an auction of Enron assets.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first commercial application of Catalytica&#8217;s Xonon technology now is the Sonoma Developmental Center in Eldridge, Calif., where an existing Kawasaki M1A-13D gas turbine was retrofitted with a Kawasaki-designed Xonon-based combustor (Figure 9). The 12-yr-old unit provides supplemental heat and power for a staff of 2,200 and 850 residents across 120 buildings.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>9. First commercial catalytic combustor installation<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec9.png" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The Sonoma Developmental Center is the first commercial catalytic combustor installation. A 12-yr-old Kawasaki gas turbine was retrofit with a Catalytica-licensed catalyst. Post-startup testing confirms that the 1.3-MW plant is operating at less than 3 ppmv NOx, less than 10 ppm CO, and less than 2 ppm VOC.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Catalytica Energy Systems Inc</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The six-week retrofit involved removing the current M1A-13D engine operating with a DLE combustor configuration, and replacing it with an advanced M1A-13X engine incorporating Xonon Cool Combustion. The reconfigured unit returned to service in November 2002. Post-startup testing confirms the 1.3-MW plant is operating at less than 3 ppm NOx—an overall 90% reduction. Additionally, the Xonon Cool Combustion system makes it possible for Kawasaki to guarantee CO levels of less than 10 ppm and VOC levels of less than 2 ppm.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytica announced in December the purchase of a Kawasaki 1.4-MW GPB15X equipped with Xonon technology. The unit is part of a heating and cooling plant for the Reader&#8217;s Digest 650,000-square-foot global headquarters in Pleasantville, N.Y., servicing approximately 1,000 employees. The plant is expected to be in service by this July.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Catalytica reports that it also has demonstrated sub-5 ppm NOx levels on gas turbines manufactured by Rolls-Royce Allison (Indianapolis, Ind.). GE Power Systems plans to begin shipment of a Xonon-equipped 11-MW GE10 gas turbine in 2004. String testing is scheduled in Florence, Italy, this year with orders beginning this fall. Emissions targets for the GE10 are 3 ppm NOx, 100 ppm CO, and 10 ppm VOC.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By Dr. Robert Peltier PE, Sr. Editor</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/80/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/80/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=80&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/gas-turbine-combustors-drive-emissions-toward-nil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec1.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec2.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec3.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec4.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec5.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec6.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec7.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec8.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062408-0711-gasturbinec9.png" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oyster Creek Power 8, Freeport, Texas</title>
		<link>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>japat30</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Combined Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low emission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operated and maintained by Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Texas
Owned by Dynegy (50%) and American National Power (50%)

Sub-10 ppm NOx has been the dream of gas turbine users for many years, and currently there is only one OEM that can deliver on that promise. But OEMs are no longer the only suppliers of NOx retrofit hardware. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=49&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Operated and maintained by Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Texas</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Owned by Dynegy (50%) and American National Power (50%)<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Sub-10 ppm NOx has been the dream of gas turbine users for many years, and currently there is only one OEM that can deliver on that promise. But OEMs are no longer the only suppliers of NOx retrofit hardware. Power Systems Manufacturing has developed a sub-5 ppm NOx retrofit kit for the GE 7EA that has taken dry low-NOx technology to the next level. Dow Chemical took a chance with the new technology and now operates the world&#8217;s cleanest—in terms of NOx—gas turbine.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By Troy Bearden and Curtis Banks, Dow Chemical Co.&#8217;s Texas Operations<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Power 8 at Dow&#8217;s Oyster Creek site consists of three natural gas–fired GE Frame 7EAs and a 200-MW double extraction full condensing steam turbine originally commissioned between July and November 1994. The units are baseloaded and operate under power production contracts, although their primary use is to generate steam for Dow Chemical. The plant is capable of producing 440 MW. Dow supplies steam and power to the other plants at Oyster Creek and Plant A. Oyster Creek&#8217;s Power 8 is the newest of four powerhouses Dow operates at Freeport.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Oyster Creek Power 8 is not only the newest plant in the Dow Chemical fleet; it also has the lowest NOx emissions. The original dry low-NOx (DLN) 1.0 system ran about 12.6 ppm NOx and 3.3 ppm CO during normal operation at baseload. With the auxiliary duct burner–fired HRSGs, Power 8 is just barely going to make the NOx reductions required by state air pollution control authorities, assuming planned duct burner NOx reductions continue on schedule. The state NOx reduction plan requires a plantwide 80% reduction in NOx by 2008.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Lower NOx limits drove project<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The project began over two and a half years ago when new Houston-area emission regulations were introduced to reduce NOx in incremental steps through 2008. For Dow, the lower limits meant it would have to make significant improvement in NOx reductions from its fleet of gas turbines and gas-fired HRSGs. After considering a variety of alternatives, Dow finally settled on standard selective catalytic reduction (SCR) with some form of ammonia injection. This approach was selected because the technology is well understood and has low technical risk. However, its installation and maintenance costs would be high, especially due to Power 8&#8217;s small site.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Power Systems Manufacturing (PSM) first began pitching its proprietary Low Emissions Combustor III (LEC III) early in 2001. But because the technology had no track record, the proposals didn&#8217;t get very far with Dow&#8217;s pragmatic operating staff. Dow&#8217;s refinery must operate reliably, and the possibility of any interruption of power and steam production was just too large a risk to take on an unproven technology.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">In the meantime, PSM won a contract with TransAlta Cogeneration LP&#8217;s Fort Saskatchewan plant in Alberta, Canada. Fort Saskatchewan is a combined-cycle cogeneration plant that produces 120 MW of electricity and 100 tons/hr of process steam for a Dow Chemical facility. Prior to the turbine retrofit, the plant was having trouble getting NOx any lower than 17 ppm, and CO was fixed around 14 ppm. After installation of the LEC III system, EnTech Environmental certified 6-ppm NOx emissions and an average of 2.5 ppm of CO.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>1. Low-emission combustor.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">The first application of Power Systems Manufacturing&#8217;s low-emissions combustor on a 7EA turbine was at TransAlta Cogeneration LP&#8217;s Fort Saskatchewan plant in Alberta, Canada. Prior to the retrofit, the plant operated no lower than 17 ppm NOx and 14 ppm of CO. Afterwards, certified tests showed 6-ppm NOx emissions and an average of 2.5 ppm of CO.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>2. Quick change.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Retrofitting of the LEC components took only a few days. Installation of the LEC hardware began on March 20 and was piggybacked on other turbine repairs. The turbine was buttoned up on April 11 and started up the next morning.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">By the end of 2001, the replacement hardware was installed and producing 5.8-ppm dry NOx with no tweaking of fuel/air ratios. By September 2002, the hardware had run for 8,000 hours, maintaining 5.8 ppm NOx. A 24,000-hour major overhaul removed the hardware and returned it to PSM for refurbishment. Reinstallation is planned for September 2004. TransAlta was ecstatic not only about the results—the life increased to 16,000 hours of operation before refurbishment, compared with the 12,000-hour OEM limit—but also about the system&#8217;s 40% cost savings.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">That was the kind of operating data that Dow needed to see to make a commitment to PSM for its LEC III technology. By January 2002, Dow invited PSM back for another sales pitch. This time PSM offered an 8-ppm guarantee for the simple reason that GE guarantees 9 ppm on the 7EA with DLN 1.0. Although the designs are significantly different in the way fuel and air are mixed prior to combustion; GE&#8217;s venturi in the liner is not 100% premix, whereas PSM&#8217;s low-emission combustor (LEC) is.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">A deal was finally struck in November 2002 with several interesting requirements: the performance contract will include 8 ppm NOx as the guarantee point, but the design target will be 5 ppm, and PSM will work to reach that goal until both parties agree that no further reductions are practical. The schedule was tight; parts were due on the site on January 2 of this year. But because Dow requires that at least two of the three Frame 7EAs be operational at any time, other issues delayed the major outage until March 20, at which time the PSM hardware installation would be piggybacked on other planned major repairs. By April 8 the other repairs were completed and the LEC assemblies were installed. The turbine was buttoned up on April 11 and placed on turning gear that night, with startup scheduled for the morning.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>Results count<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Startup was uneventful, but the NOx readings caused quite a stir. Using default fuel splits of 81% primary/19% secondary, NOx readings were 6.75 ppm and CO was approximately 9 ppm at baseload power and 2,055ºF conditions. Tuning the splits over the next couple of days gave the engineers a better handle on the sensitivity of the system, and they arrived at a final split of 84%/16% with 4.75 ppm NOx and negligible CO using EPA-certified emissions test instruments within a week of initial installation of the LEC III—and meeting PSM&#8217;s design target of 5.0 ppm NOx.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">This is an industry first for GE&#8217;s Frame 7EA turbine emissions control. Full turndown capability was maintained, and, at low part-load operation, the LEC system achieved emissions levels similar to baseload operation. Even more important, the performance of the LEC gave Dow the option to cancel the SCR, saving millions of dollars in capital costs and eliminating the complexity of an additional piece of hardware.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Dow Chemical Co.&#8217;s Curtis Banks says, &#8220;In the future, we intend to use PSM&#8217;s next-generation fuel nozzle technology and expect to see an additional 10% reduction in NOx, perhaps down to 4.2 ppm. I was also very impressed with PSM and its dedicated staff and the strict attention to detail displayed during the design and installation of this system. There was no extra down time associated with the LEC installation during our hot gas path inspection.&#8221;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Banks adds that, &#8220;as a matter of fact, I found out about PSM&#8217;s new LEC-III system by reading about it in POWER.&#8221; Perhaps that was the first step in Oyster Creek Power 8 becoming a Top Plant for 2003.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>3. Low emissions.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Less than 5 ppm NOx and negligible CO using EPA-certified emissions test instruments were achieved within a week of initial installation of the LEC III at the Oyster Creek plant.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: OCL Limited Partnership</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman;"><strong>4. Key staff.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" border="0">
<col></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-right:none;padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek4.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:1px;" valign="middle">
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Troy Bearden, Power 8 plant manager (left), and Curtis Banks, technical adviser for Dow Chemical&#8217;s Texas Operations (right), standing in Power 8&#8217;s control room. Power 8 is owned by the Oyster Creek Limited Partnership and is run and maintained by Dow Chemical. It is located at the Oyster Creek site of Dow Chemical&#8217;s Texas Operations in Freeport, Texas.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times New Roman;">Courtesy: Dow Chemical</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/powergen.wordpress.com/49/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/powergen.wordpress.com/49/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=powergen.wordpress.com&blog=1986086&post=49&subd=powergen&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://powergen.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/oyster-creek-power-8-freeport-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cfd35b9fa114befed5fdfd4708543e59?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">japat30</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek1.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek2.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek3.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://powergen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/062308-0111-oystercreek4.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>